Would you mind uploading the report Alan? From some reason I’m not able to log int to the wiki nor to properly reset my password :(
Jarcec > On Nov 1, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Ross, Alan D <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we're as far along on this update as we're going to be. Jarcec will > you please upload it to the appropriate place? > > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ross, Alan D > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 12:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: ONI-LDA-C > > I updated the podling document to reflect this issue and WIP to address. > Only thing I don't have is a date when we'll be done with LDA-C. Any ideas? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Smith, Nathanael P [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 2:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ONI-LDA-C > > Hi Mark, > > Option B with Spark LDA is already underway, I am not sure of an ETA on the > code changes. > > - Nathanael > > > >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Mark Grover <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> Vartika mentioned this in a hallway conversation, we decided to bring >> it up here. >> >> ONI's LDA implementation >> <https://github.com/Open-Network-Insight/oni-lda-c/blob/01f1d6fa81ba0b >> 3aa1080ca3a3ebd5c679720735/license.txt> >> is >> written in C, but most importantly, is GPL Licensed. And, from the >> looks of it, it's a hard dependency. >> >> So, as we migrate to Apache, this needs to be changed. Either: >> A. it needs to be a softer dependency, or B. we need to find a >> substitute. >> >> I have noticed Spark MLLib has LDA, and given that this algorithm is >> being called from Spark anyways, Option B (with Spark) would be a >> reasonable choice. >> >> What do others think? Any other options? >> >> Mark >
