Hi Cesar, Ok, sounds like you're all set. I'd recommend that if you do run into questions like this, don't wait for a board report, just drop a line off to [email protected]. We'll get back to you.
John On 2017-02-28 03:13 (-0500), Cesar Berho <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > > Appreciated for getting back to us. Initially we did the question to mentors, > which actually suggested us to post it on the PMC report. > > > In regards them; they have helped us a lot, among the guys on the community, > and as we actually ramp and now going over documentation towards Apache > release, the notion of code scan is clear, process wise at least, and > complemented with your answer in regards the existence of the tool for static > analysis, we'll follow-up with Infra team to get guidance on the setup. > > > In regards IP review, SGA was submitted to Secretary back in October of last > year, I can look for the email if needed. Now clarifying a little bit on this > one, as you mention the code is compatible, but we we were wondering if after > initial code migration to ASF repositories, then another review was required. > The gap closed with the release documentation. Over the past months we have > got individual feedback from mentors, about the licenses. > > > One thing that also was noted and we acknowledge is the fact of moving most > of the communications to the mailing lists, this Slack app has become very > popular and helped us for quick interactions, however something that we're > carrying over are all the "extended" conversations that can be enriched over > here, as those facilitate input from Community in general. > > > Thanks, > > Cesar > > ________________________________ > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:44:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Following up on board report > > Dear Spot Podling, > > I wanted to follow up with you regarding the comments in your board > report. In it, you wrote: > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > aware of? > > IPMC this point has been posted on the last two report, we have not > received any feedback in terms of how it goes, please comment. > > Please elaborate on the process for code scanning and IP reviews. On the > last report this was brought to attention but no communication was > received. > > Ideally these are questions you are raising to your mentors, and your > mentors are giving you the right info. Is that happening? I noticed for > instance that you received only a single sign off. Do you have engagement > with all 4 of your mentors? > > Presently, the ASF provides static analysis via SonarQube, You can find the > instance at http://builds.apache.org/analysis . Please reach out to infra > if you need some guides on how to get it running for your project. > > RE IP review - I'm not 100% sure what you mean. I'm assuming that an SGA > was executed? I can't find any documentation. It looks like regardless the > project was always apache licensed. Have your mentors provided any input > on good/bad IP practices? > > John >
