Damn Michael beat me to it ;D On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:58 PM Michael Ridley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given that the project has not had a release, I don't see any reason to > stick with 1.6 support. Now seems like a good time to switch to 2 if that's > what people want to do. I haven't had time to do a deep dive on Spark 2 yet > so I don't have enough information to have a technical opinion, other than > that I hear a lot of excitement and preference for Spark 2. > > Michael Ridley > Senior Solutions Architect > Cloudera > > Sent from my mobile. > Pardon any spelling errors. > > > On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:39 PM, Segerlind, Nathan L < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi everybody. > > > > There's been some talk about upgrading to Spark 2.1. > > > > Do people think this is worthwhile? > > > > Would others like to see continued support for 1.6? For how long and it > what capacity? > > > > Should we maintain two branches? > > > > Or perhaps drive the 2.1 branch forward and only send bug fixes to the > 1.6 branch for another year or so? > > > > >
