----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#review9688 -----------------------------------------------------------
Except the two comments, all seems fine to me. "ant docs" - success for me. /DISCLAIMER.txt <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#comment20656> As Apache Sqoop is a Top Level Project now, this whole paragraph talking about on-going incubation of the project seems old. Do we require this file any more? /pom-old.xml <https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/#comment20657> Not related to your change here, but do we need to update this version? - Abhijeet Gaikwad On July 31, 2012, 7:35 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 31, 2012, 7:35 p.m.) > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > Description > ------- > > I've removed references to the incubator. > > > This addresses bug SQOOP-528. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-528 > > > Diffs > ----- > > /DISCLAIMER.txt 1367605 > /ivy/sqoop-test.xml 1367605 > /ivy/sqoop.xml 1367605 > /pom-old.xml 1367605 > /src/docs/dev/compiling.txt 1367605 > /src/docs/dev/preface.txt 1367605 > /src/docs/user/preface.txt 1367605 > /src/docs/user/support.txt 1367605 > /src/docs/web/footer.xsl 1367605 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6248/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jarek Cecho > >
