[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13684789#comment-13684789
]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-943:
------------------------------------
Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12588050/bugSQOOP-943.patch
against branch SQOOP-1082.
{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All tests passed
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/20/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Sqoop2: Repository wide configuration of immutable disk structures
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-943
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-943
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.99.1
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.3
>
> Attachments: bugSQOOP-943.patch, bugSQOOP-943.patch
>
>
> During investigation of SQOOP-878 I've realized that it would be quite
> helpful to promote the idea of Repository on disk structures to first class
> citizens. As such we can explicitly ask repository implementation if the
> internals are suitable for use or not. We can also limit all major changes to
> one method that will be conditionally called only if user explicitly allows
> on disk structure changes (on disk structure upgrade of JDBC repository would
> be table schema changes).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
