[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13693425#comment-13693425
 ] 

Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-1073:
-------------------------------------

Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12589674/bugSQOOP-1073.patch 
against branch sqoop2.

{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All tests passed

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/25/console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Sqoop2: Introduce schema for transferred data
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1073
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.99.2
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 1.99.3
>
>         Attachments: bugSQOOP-1073.patch
>
>
> Sqoop2 similarly as Sqoop1 is not keeping schema of transferred data. As we 
> are planning to modularize entire framework, I believe that schema should be 
> generated and provided to all moving pieces (like {{extractor}}, {{loader}}, 
> ...).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to