[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14111352#comment-14111352
]
Veena Basavaraj edited comment on SQOOP-1436 at 8/26/14 9:14 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RB link : https://reviews.apache.org/r/25074/
I just used the java valid identifier convention at this point since it is the
norm most places use
was (Author: vybs):
RB link : https://reviews.apache.org/r/25074/
> Sqoop2: Support custom form name via the Form Annotation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1436
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1436
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Abraham Elmahrek
> Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
> Labels: newbie
> Fix For: 1.99.4
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-1436.patch
>
>
> Form names and input names are currently derived from the configuration
> property name that they exist in (example 1). It would be nice if custom
> names could be provided so that the property names could remain simple.
> Example 1:
> The derived form name for the "table" property in the configuration object
> below is "table".
> {code}
> @ConfigurationClass
> public class FromJobConfiguration {
> @Form public TableForm table;
> ...
> }
> {code}
> Example 2:
> The form name for the "table" member in the the configuration object below is
> "from-table".
> {code}
> @ConfigurationClass
> public class FromJobConfiguration {
> @Form(name="from-table")
> public TableForm table;
> ...
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
