-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25325/#review52288
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Jarek Cecho


On Sept. 4, 2014, 3:37 a.m., Qian Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25325/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 4, 2014, 3:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-1390
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1390
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-trunk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If you import a table "users". Sqoop will generate an entity class named 
> "users.java". The class will be compiled, submitted and used by a mapreduce 
> job. If the target file format is Avro or Parquet, an Avro schema will be 
> generated as well. According to Avro specification, the entity class is 
> described as "record", the name of the "record" is "users".
> 
> For Parquet file format handling, we use the Kite SDK to manage Parquet file 
> reading and writing with minimal efforts. Kite requires an Avro schema and 
> all data records to be packed into GenericRecord instances. There will be a 
> problem here. Kite will read the schema first and try to instantiate a record 
> regarding its name. In this case, Kite will try to instantiate a "users" 
> class. Unfortunately, there is a "users.java" out there. This will cause 
> mapreduce job fail. 
> 
> The patch proposes to change the "AvroSchemaGenerator" class. Record name 
> will have a prefix. In this example, the record name of "users.java" will be 
> changed to "sqoop_import_users".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/orm/AvroSchemaGenerator.java 806bace 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/orm/TableClassName.java 88ab622 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25325/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All existing unittests passed. No new unittest is added. 
> Manually tested couple of Avro and Parquet import tests successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to