[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14155892#comment-14155892
]
Abraham Elmahrek edited comment on SQOOP-1367 at 10/2/14 12:43 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
There are a couple of reasons I think we should merge back:
# The work for FROM/TO is coming to a close.
# Instead of turning SQOOP-1367 into a new "sqoop2" branch, we should move
development back to the sqoop2 branch. There's no need for this branch now
since the dangerous part is over.
Great idea on keeping a date. How about we merge Wednesday of next week (10/8)?
This should give everyone sufficient time to wrap things up. Does that make
sense [~vybs]?
was (Author: abec):
There are a couple of reasons I think we should merge back:
# The work for FROM/TO is coming to a close.
# Instead of turning SQOOP-1367 into a new "sqoop2" branch, we should move
development back to the sqoop2 branch. There's no need for this branch now
since the dangerous part is over.
Great idea on keeping a date. How about we merge Wednesday of next week (10/8)?
> Sqoop2: From/To
> ---------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1367
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 1.99.3
> Reporter: Abraham Elmahrek
> Assignee: Abraham Elmahrek
>
> Hadoop shouldn't have a special meaning in Sqoop. HDFS, HBase, etc. should
> have their own connectors. Sqoop should transfer data FROM one connector TO
> another. To be more explicit, instead of IMPORT/EXPORT, provide API for
> FROM/TO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
