[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Veena Basavaraj updated SQOOP-1603:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
This ticket was created while reviewing the Kite Connector use case where the 
destroyer does the actual data set merge
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26963/diff/#
{code}
public void destroy(DestroyerContext context, LinkConfiguration link,
      ToJobConfiguration job) {
    LOG.info("Running Kite connector destroyer");
    // Every loader instance creates a temporary dataset. If the MR job is
    // successful, all temporary dataset should be merged as one dataset,
    // otherwise they should be deleted all.
    String[] uris = KiteDatasetExecutor.listTemporaryDatasetUris(
        job.toDataset.uri);
    if (context.isSuccess()) {
      KiteDatasetExecutor executor = new KiteDatasetExecutor(job.toDataset.uri,
          context.getSchema(), link.link.fileFormat);
      for (String uri : uris) {
        executor.mergeDataset(uri);
        LOG.info(String.format("Temporary dataset %s merged", uri));
      }
    } else {
      for (String uri : uris) {
        KiteDatasetExecutor.deleteDataset(uri);
        LOG.info(String.format("Temporary dataset %s deleted", uri));
      }
    }
  }
{code}

Wondering if such things should be its own phase rather than in destroyers. The 
responsibility of destroyer is more to clean up/ closing/ anything thats pretty 
much destroying, should such operations that modify records its own step.


  was:This ticket was created while reviewing the Kite Connector use case.


>  Sqoop2:  Explicit support for Merge in the Sqoop Job lifecyle
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1603
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Qian Xu
>
> This ticket was created while reviewing the Kite Connector use case where the 
> destroyer does the actual data set merge
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26963/diff/#
> {code}
> public void destroy(DestroyerContext context, LinkConfiguration link,
>       ToJobConfiguration job) {
>     LOG.info("Running Kite connector destroyer");
>     // Every loader instance creates a temporary dataset. If the MR job is
>     // successful, all temporary dataset should be merged as one dataset,
>     // otherwise they should be deleted all.
>     String[] uris = KiteDatasetExecutor.listTemporaryDatasetUris(
>         job.toDataset.uri);
>     if (context.isSuccess()) {
>       KiteDatasetExecutor executor = new 
> KiteDatasetExecutor(job.toDataset.uri,
>           context.getSchema(), link.link.fileFormat);
>       for (String uri : uris) {
>         executor.mergeDataset(uri);
>         LOG.info(String.format("Temporary dataset %s merged", uri));
>       }
>     } else {
>       for (String uri : uris) {
>         KiteDatasetExecutor.deleteDataset(uri);
>         LOG.info(String.format("Temporary dataset %s deleted", uri));
>       }
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> Wondering if such things should be its own phase rather than in destroyers. 
> The responsibility of destroyer is more to clean up/ closing/ anything thats 
> pretty much destroying, should such operations that modify records its own 
> step.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to