----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27248/#review58816 -----------------------------------------------------------
So I did miss something here. Shouldn't the config be unique per name + connector? - Abraham Elmahrek On Oct. 28, 2014, 3:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27248/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 28, 2014, 3:49 p.m.) > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > Repository: sqoop-sqoop2 > > > Description > ------- > > see jira > > Note: This unique ness is stricter scross the entire sqoop system, since we > want to be able to use the config names independently ( wihtout any > configurable Id along with it ) to create jobs > > Note I have rebased to the latest on 28th morning/ > > > Diffs > ----- > > > repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java > e584a19 > > repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaConstants.java > f579b93 > > repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaUpgradeQuery.java > 0bdb4c6 > > repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyTestCase.java > edcef70 > > repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestConnectorHandling.java > ca40545 > > repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestInputTypes.java > 7f35f8c > > repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestRespositorySchemaUpgrade.java > 7687be7 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27248/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > yes > > > Thanks, > > Veena Basavaraj > >
