+1 (non-binding) * Verified checksums and signature files * Ran tests * Ran upgrade from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 * Ran an import job and export job * Ran batch script for import
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > * Verified checksums and signature files > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license file > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...) > * Run tests > * Run upgrade scenario from 1.99.3 to 1.99.4 > > Jarcec > > > On Nov 16, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Developers, Committers, PMC members, > > > > Thank you for testing 1.99.4 rc0 so throughly. > > A number of critical bugs were found and resolved. Therefore, we’ve > > packaged up a new release candidate. > > > > The second release candidate of the fourth release of Apache Sqoop 2, > > version 1.99.4 is ready. > > > > Please vote by Monday, November 24. > > > > Change log: > > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/release-1.99.4-rc1/CHANGELOG.txt > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5): > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.4-rc1/ > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.4-rc1 > > > > The KEYS file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS > > > > (Note that the tarball is in Jarcec's home directory, but its signed > > with my keys) > > > > Keep calm and vote, > > > > Gwen > >
