-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28795/#review64312
-----------------------------------------------------------


Have a couple high level thoughts. Good first shot.


client/pom.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28795/#comment106946>

    hadoop-common is very big I think. Is this the only place delegation token 
handling exists?



pom.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28795/#comment106945>

    Move to a separate Jira since we do not know what this will do?


- Abraham Elmahrek


On Dec. 8, 2014, 1:55 a.m., richard zhou wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28795/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 8, 2014, 1:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Delegation Token support for Authentication.
> It depends on Hadoop 2.6.0+. Currently, Sqoop depends on Hadoop 2.5.1. Not 
> sure whether there is plan to upgrade Hadoop version from 2.5.1 to 2.6. 
> Anyway, sooner or Later, it will happen.
> Initial patch with manual test. Integration test will be in another JIRA 
> SQOOP-1633
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   client/pom.xml b53c9d3d74b7eeb8ff2a64bee1c8f7ec5144c281 
>   client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/ResourceRequest.java 
> 6be1db87f94e1712399f724c740da1416389ba3b 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/MapContext.java 
> 2229889ca6fa45f70c938a04576b4c16999f4088 
>   dist/src/main/server/conf/sqoop.properties 
> fe4dfb62f74215b1521699cd7612c45d307365c2 
>   pom.xml e6ffc78cc332efa36b2a76c609bf37a57aeba1a7 
>   server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/filter/SqoopAuthenticationFilter.java 
> bb6629047f1eaa89b42a3f99384e0f61a51a6b9a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28795/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> richard zhou
> 
>

Reply via email to