[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14241545#comment-14241545
]
Veena Basavaraj commented on SQOOP-1706:
----------------------------------------
Ai should also mention another reason I think having designs in wiki makes
sense .
A doc fix was not considered important for a release.
Here we have a broken doc in
http://sqoop.apache.org/docs/1.99.4/Sqoop5MinutesDemo.html for 1.99.4 and I'd
rather would have just edited the wiki to fix this rather than lobby to get
this patch in a RC for a release.
> Add API doc for the IDF interface and Schema -> ColumnTypes
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1706
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: sqoop2-framework
> Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
> Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
> Fix For: 1.99.5
>
> Attachments: FromTo_Schema_IDF.001.png
>
>
> Since there can be multiple implementation of the IDF and connectors can
> chose to use a their specific implementation for IDF, document this as a
> PUBLIC apis
> Schema is part of the IDF interface and it is important to explain the
> different column types we support and how in one of the implementations we
> has certain assumptions for parsing from string to obejct
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
