[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14243460#comment-14243460
 ] 

Gwen Shapira commented on SQOOP-1878:
-------------------------------------

If GET doesn't do an update, then it returns a cached result that the thread 
updated.
If we want to make sure the result makes sense to the user and avoid flooding 
RM/JT, we need to invalidate the cache in the right intervals.

Also, while I agree the current behavior is highly misleading, I'm not sure it 
qualifies as an urgent bug (since we discovered that we do the update even for 
non-running jobs, just in different place).

Since there's no urgent fix (AFAIK), lets take few more hours to think it 
properly and make sure we get the right solution.

> JobManager status method is a GET call and should not performa update 
> operations
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1878
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1878
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
>             Fix For: 1.99.5
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-1878.patch
>
>
> JobManager status method is a GET call and should not performa update 
> operations
> status () method on JobManager is get request from the rest API. it should 
> not ever do an update.
> if we need more faster updates of job, then it is best to create a new action 
> that can do it or reduce the updateSleep parameter to less than 5 minutes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to