[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14246052#comment-14246052
 ] 

Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-1882:
-------------------------------------

Testing file 
[SQOOP-1882-v5.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12687127/SQOOP-1882-v5.patch]
 against branch sqoop2 took 0:24:44.422148.

{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch add/modify test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All unit tests passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All integration tests passed

Console output is available 
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/776/console].

This message is automatically generated.

> JobManager currently ignores the TO connector IDF and assumed all IDF use 
> String for the generic T
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1882
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1882
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sqoop2-framework
>            Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
>            Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
>             Fix For: 1.99.5
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-1882-v1.patch, SQOOP-1882-v2.patch, 
> SQOOP-1882-v4.patch, SQOOP-1882-v5.patch
>
>
> assumes that the TO connector IDF is same as FROM connector IDF
> Also make sure to add to both the IDF related JARS ( hence maintain a set 
> rather than a list)
> another related bug where the IDF type was always assumed to be String in the 
> Jobmanager



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to