-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30699/#review73293
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Jarek Cecho


On Feb. 5, 2015, 10:24 p.m., Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30699/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 5, 2015, 10:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-1841
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1841
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> commit aa8aba0d9b28d4e07d8ea31c118b300b8aba091b
> Author: Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]>
> Date:   Wed Feb 4 23:33:59 2015 -0800
> 
>     SQOOP-1841: Sqoop2: Upgrade from 1.99.1 to 1.99.4 onwards is broken
> 
> :100644 100644 c991e5c... f066727... M  
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java
> :100644 100644 ce7b6cb... a242ff9... M  
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaInsertUpdateDeleteSelectQuery.java
> :100644 100644 606fc68... bf61208... M  
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaUpgradeQuery.java
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java
>  c991e5c 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaInsertUpdateDeleteSelectQuery.java
>  ce7b6cb 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaUpgradeQuery.java
>  606fc68 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30699/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested that the upgrade from 1.99.2 installation to 1.99.5 trunk 
> (latest for sqoop2) gets beyond constraint manipulation. The existence of 
> duplicate names is a problem that will need to be addressed in SQOOP-1790.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abraham Elmahrek
> 
>

Reply via email to