[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14344333#comment-14344333
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SQOOP-2159:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 68595856f6f9e51cc176510aff55dbaf18e36163 in sqoop's branch 
refs/heads/sqoop2 from [~abec]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;h=6859585 ]

SQOOP-2159: Sqoop2: Use BeforeSuite/AfterSuite for startHadoop/stopHadoop in 
integration tests

(Jarek Jarcec Cecho via Abraham Elmahrek)


> Sqoop2: Use BeforeSuite/AfterSuite for startHadoop/stopHadoop in integration 
> tests
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-2159
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2159
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.99.5
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 1.99.6
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-2159.patch
>
>
> I've noticed that {{BeforeClass}} annotation in test-ng is behaving slightly 
> differently than I was expecting. For most integration tests it behaves as 
> anticipated - it will run before any test methods inside any test class. 
> However when it's used with {{@DataProvider}} it will be run for every 
> parametrized call. This means that for example {{PartitionerTest}} will 
> initialize the {{HadoopMiniCluster}} on all 20 executions, which is adding to 
> the slowness of this test.
> Test-ng have additional annotation called {{@BeforeSuite}} that will run only 
> once even if given test class is using {{@DataProvider}} and hence I would 
> suggest to use it for {{startHadoop()}} method. And similarly {{@AfterSuite}} 
> for {{stopHadoop()}}.
> I did not measure impact on {{PartitionerTest}}, but making this change for 
> other integration test that I'm writing got the execution from 10 down to 3 
> minutes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to