Indeed. That pesky 2.1.0 distribution is back. Qian, any thoughts on what's producing that?
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we restart the vote after the source tarball with signature and > checksum files gets uploaded? So that everyone is voting on the same set of > bits? > > Jarcec > > > On Apr 12, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Venkat Ranganathan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry for being late. I don’t see the source tar ball (which is the > main one to vote on). > > > > Thanks > > > > Venkat > > > > > > > > On 4/9/15, 7:11 PM, "Xu, Qian A" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Dear Sqoop Developers, Committers and PMC members, > >> > >> > >> > >> This is the release candidate (RC1) for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.6. > >> > >> > >> > >> *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] *** > >> > >> > >> > >> The list of fixed issues: > >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=baa5dd788186857289916fbff35ec0985c50325d;hb=08c61a11e10bbe15a789fa12c8780c182b235de8 > >> > >> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and test > result (log/*.ant_test.log): > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~gwenshap/sqoop-1.4.6-rc1/ > >> > >> > >> > >> The tag to be voted on: > >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tree;h=d2507737ca7965cf63459761dce215bef64fb475;hb=08c61a11e10bbe15a789fa12c8780c182b235de8 > >> > >> > >> > >> The KEYS file: > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/KEYS > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for Gwen to be release mentor. > >> > >> > >> > >> --Stanley (Qian) Xu > >> > >> > >> > >
