[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14497462#comment-14497462
]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2306:
-------------------------------------
Testing file
[SQOOP-2306.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12725756/SQOOP-2306.patch]
against branch sqoop2 took 1:01:34.139705.
{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch add/modify test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All fast unit tests passed (executed 675 tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All slow unit tests passed (executed 1 tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All fast integration tests passed (executed 46
tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All slow integration tests passed (executed 22
tests)
Console output is available
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1284/console].
This message is automatically generated.
> Sqoop2: Generic JDBC: Use LinkConfiguration in Executor rather then LinkConfig
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2306
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2306
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 1.99.6
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2306.patch
>
>
> In SQOOP-2246, I've refactored the {{Executor}} class to take {{LinkConfig}}
> rather then getting every parameter separately. When looking into SQOOP-2244,
> I've realized that I need {{LinkConfiguration}} instead, because I might need
> to add additional {{Configs}} (such as the one holding query formatting
> options).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
