-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37718/#review96200
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Good stuff!


connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/configuration/LinkConfig.java
 (line 42)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/37718/#comment151520>

    This kind of competes with the normal empty value I think 
(https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/branch-1.99.6/common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/model/ConfigUtils.java#L308).


- Abraham Elmahrek


On Aug. 24, 2015, 5:19 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37718/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 24, 2015, 5:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-2505
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2505
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added config override options.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/MutableMapContext.java 06ea7a9 
>   common/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/TestMutableMapContext.java 
> 9aab7f8 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/HdfsFromInitializer.java
>  902549d 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/HdfsToInitializer.java
>  234bb71 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/configuration/LinkConfig.java
>  b54ad15 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/resources/hdfs-connector-config.properties 
> 5feae54 
>   
> connector/connector-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/TestFromInitializer.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37718/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit and integration tests are passing on my box.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jarek Cecho
> 
>

Reply via email to