[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14720384#comment-14720384
 ] 

Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2445:
-------------------------------------

Testing file 
[SQOOP-2445.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12753031/SQOOP-2445.patch]
 against branch sqoop2 took 0:52:59.035630.

{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch add/modify test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All unit tests passed (executed 1404 tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Test coverage did not decreased 
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1651/artifact/patch-process/cobertura_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} No new findbugs warnings 
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1651/artifact/patch-process/findbugs_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All integration tests passed (executed 73 tests)

Console output is available 
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1651/console].

This message is automatically generated.

> Sqoop2: Generic JDBC: Prevent use of tableColumns and sql at the same time
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-2445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2445
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>             Fix For: 1.99.7
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-2445.patch
>
>
> We're supporting data retrieval with custom query. I see bunch of code around 
> that is trying to solve situation when user enters both of custom query and 
> specifies what columns he wants to transfer from that custom query. This 
> seems to me as unnecessary complication as user can limit the column in the 
> first place by specifying appropriate query. Hence I would like to prohibit 
> this behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to