[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14721083#comment-14721083
]
Jarek Jarcec Cecho commented on SQOOP-2537:
-------------------------------------------
Would you mind dropping the "patch available" state for the time being before
SQOOP-2539 gets done [~dian.fu]?
> Sqoop2: Use object name instead of object id for the name filed in MResource
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Dian Fu
> Assignee: Dian Fu
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2537.001.patch
>
>
> Currently the meaning of the name field in MResource isn't consistent. Some
> places assume this field means the object name of the resource, such as in
> AuthorizationRequestHandler. Some places assume this field means the object
> id of the resource, such as in AuthorizationEngine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
