-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38555/#review99754
-----------------------------------------------------------


Provided we fix the InvalidRESTCallsTest  that is failing on precommit hook, 
I'm +1 with one nit:


server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/handler/LinkRequestHandler.java (lines 67 
- 68)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38555/#comment156743>

    It seems that we're logging the same line twice :)


Jarcec

- Jarek Cecho


On Sept. 21, 2015, 12:39 p.m., Dian Fu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38555/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 21, 2015, 12:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-2583
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2583
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> As object names such as job names, link names can contain informal characters 
> such as whitespace, slashes, it should be encoded in the http request.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/AuthorizationResourceRequest.java
>  0bb9a7f 
>   
> client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/JobResourceRequest.java 
> 1094ae8 
>   
> client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/LinkResourceRequest.java 
> 8391621 
>   
> client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/SubmissionResourceRequest.java
>  f0435ce 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/utils/UrlSafeUtils.java 369037a 
>   server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/handler/LinkRequestHandler.java 
> fe0c4d8 
>   server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/server/RequestContext.java f8401aa 
>   
> test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/server/InformalObjectNameTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38555/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dian Fu
> 
>

Reply via email to