[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14971920#comment-14971920
 ] 

Hudson commented on SQOOP-2632:
-------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Sqoop2 #931 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Sqoop2/931/])
SQOOP-2632: Sqoop2: add partition class to FROM (jarcec: 
[https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git&a=commit&h=0773c10f83d2714cd05ce37393ec968f940ad302])
* 
connector/connector-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/hdfs/HdfsConnector.java
* 
execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/execution/mapreduce/MapreduceExecutionEngine.java
* 
connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/GenericJdbcConnector.java
* 
connector/connector-kite/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/kite/KiteConnector.java
* connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/etl/From.java
* execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/MRJobConstants.java


> Sqoop2: add partition class to FROM
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-2632
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2632
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Dian Fu
>            Assignee: Dian Fu
>             Fix For: 1.99.7
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-2632.001.patch
>
>
> Each {{SqoopMapper}} will process one {{SqoopSplit}}. {{SqoopSplit}} is 
> instantiated by the MR framework. Let's suppose that MR framework loads 
> {{SqoopSplit}} with classloader A. As {{SqoopSplit}} has one field 
> {{partition}}, so when {{SqoopSplit}} is loaded by classloader A, class 
> {{Partition}} will also be loaded by classloader A and field {{partition}} 
> will be of type {{A.Partition}}. 
> In {{SqoopMapper}}, we will call {{extractor.extract(extractorContext, 
> fromConfig, fromJob, partition)}}. To provide classpath isolation, we will 
> load class {{Extractor}} with a custom classloader {{B}}, so class 
> {{Partition}} in {{Extractor}} will be loaded by classloader {{B}}. This will 
> cause type miss-match between {{A.Partition}} and {{B.Partition}} when we 
> call {{extractor.extract(extractorContext, fromConfig, fromJob, partition}}.
> To solve this issue, we need to make sure class {{Partition}} not be loaded 
> by the custom classloader {{B}}. To achieve this, we need firstly provide a 
> mechanism to let {{SqoopMapper}} know the class name of {{Partition}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to