> On Jan. 26, 2016, 6:45 p.m., Abraham Fine wrote:
> > +1 but would you mind updating the jira with some information around the 
> > motivation for this change (I think it may help for future reference)?

Hi Abe,
Thanks a lot for the review. :) Updated the patch to fix an issue just found. 

For the motivation of this change, currently the integration tests have two 
inheritance paths: SqoopTestCase and JettyTestCase. We want to simplity it and 
switch all the integration tests to SqoopTestCase and then all the integration 
tests can make use of the infrastructure mechanism. I will update the JIRA 
description.


- Dian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42793/#review116401
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 27, 2016, 2:12 a.m., Dian Fu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42793/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 27, 2016, 2:12 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-2762
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2762
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Provide test infrastructure base class for connector loading tests
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/test/testcases/ConnectorTestCase.java 
> f071786 
>   test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/test/testcases/JettyTestCase.java 
> d4ca396 
>   
> test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/connectorloading/BlacklistedConnectorTest.java
>  66c20a1 
>   
> test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/connectorloading/ClasspathTest.java
>  4aed991 
>   
> test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/connectorloading/ConnectorClasspathIsolationTest.java
>  295e049 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42793/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dian Fu
> 
>

Reply via email to