Here we are :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2925
I've corrected my mistake. Sorry for that. For the first shot it was not clear for me that you'd like me to open a ticket for it too. Thanks for your help and guidance, Cheers Attila On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Attila Szabo <asz...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi Jarcec, > > Not because you did advise to first share it with the community. But I'll > open one for it right now! :) > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hey Attila, >> is there a JIRA associated with it? >> >> Jarcec >> >> > On May 18, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Attila Szabo <asz...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I think in my previous mail I've an invalid review ticket link. >> > >> > The proper one is this: >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/47110/diff/1#index_header >> > >> > Sorry for the confusion! >> > >> > Cheers, >> > M. >> > >> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Attila Szabo <asz...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Do you have got any comments on this? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> M. >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Attila Szabo <asz...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hey Jarcec, >> >>> >> >>> Sorry for this, but I've forgot this one... >> >>> >> >>> Please find my proposed changes here: >> >>> >> >>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47108/diff/1#index_header >> >>> >> >>> Please also review it when you'll have time for that! >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Maugli >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho < >> jar...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi Attila, >> >>>> thank you for looking into how to make Sqoop 1 compilation faster. >> I’m >> >>>> also in the camp of devs who is affected by the turn around of at >> least 3 >> >>>> minutes for one simple change :( I’m sadly not an ivy expert either, >> but >> >>>> I’m sure that we can do some staged approach to make at least option >> to >> >>>> build faster. Could you open a JIRA and attach the patch there? >> Sadly our >> >>>> mailing lists doesn’t allow attachments so the patch did not made it >> to >> >>>> list. >> >>>> >> >>>> Jarcec >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Attila Szabo <asz...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hi all, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> First let me introduce myself to the community: >> >>>>> I'm Attila Szabo. I'm a software engineer at Cloudera since Oct. >> 2015, >> >>>> and I've just recently (March this year) started to contribute >> Sqoop. So as >> >>>> you can see I'm quite new in this community, but also I'm very >> enthusiastic >> >>>> to join the Sqoop development. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'd like to ask a question about Ivy resolve, and how to make it >> >>>> affective. >> >>>>> I have to highlight that I'm not an ant or ivy expert, so maybe this >> >>>> is possible I've missed something! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> However I've faced the following issue on my dev pc: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Every ant operation is very slow at me, because regardless I have >> the >> >>>> artifacts in my local ivy cache or not, it goes to the maven2 repo >> to check >> >>>> something connected to the resolve process. It doesn't download >> anything, >> >>>> as I've already got the dependencies, however this process is still >> quite >> >>>> slow (on my home network for example it could take 2-5 minutes). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I've seen that it looks for the dependencies in the local .m2 >> >>>> repository, but usually I do not have those artifacts in my local >> .m2 and >> >>>> also for me it would make sense to have a maven independent solution. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> So I've read a few things about ivy resolver, and got a workaround >> >>>> (details in the attached patch file), which provides another FS >> related >> >>>> resolver points to my local ivy cache, and that gives the required >> >>>> performance for me (10 seconds max the resolve phase, once I've >> downloaded >> >>>> all the dependencies). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> My questions are the following: >> >>>>> • Is it a valid solution, or did I make any fundamental >> mistakes? >> >>>>> • If the ivy cache related way is not preferred (by any >> reason), >> >>>> is there any EZ to access and run solution to have the related >> artifacts >> >>>> installed/downloaded in my local maven repo. >> >>>>> • Is there any other way to have a fast resolution without >> >>>> "hacking" around the ivysettings or the local maven repo (it is >> possible >> >>>> I've just missed an ant task, or something in the docs). >> >>>>> Many thanks for the help, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Attila Szabo >> >>>>> Sotware Engineer >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> >> >>> Attila Szabo >> >>> Sotware Engineer >> >>> >> >>> <http://www.cloudera.com> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Attila Szabo >> >> Sotware Engineer >> >> >> >> <http://www.cloudera.com> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Attila Szabo >> > Sotware Engineer >> > >> > <http://www.cloudera.com> >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Attila Szabo > Sotware Engineer > > <http://www.cloudera.com> > -- Best regards, Attila Szabo Sotware Engineer <http://www.cloudera.com>
