[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15553631#comment-15553631
 ] 

Attila Szabo commented on SQOOP-3022:
-------------------------------------

Hi [~Tagar],

In connection with "ORA-12838: cannot read/modify an object after modifying it 
in parallel" you're absolutely right, and if you check the OraOop related 
sources you could see we're doing exactly the same what was your guess:
1 transaction, many records. It is scalable, but has to be aware about that 
when parallel writing path is open no one else should try to read/modify.

To make it even more scalable OraOop has a solution to create a partitioned 
table, insert into those partition tables, and at the end only move the 
partition under the table with easy to execute alter statements. It's working 
quite good.

On the front of INSERT ALL:
Never tried it, have to check it tomorrow.

> sqoop export for Oracle generates tremendous amounts of redo logs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-3022
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3022
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: codegen, connectors, connectors/oracle
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.4.5, 1.4.6
>            Reporter: Ruslan Dautkhanov
>              Labels: export, oracle
>
> Sqoop export for Oracle generates tremendous amounts of redo logs (comparable 
> to export size or more).
> We have put target tables in nologgin mode, but Oracle will still generate 
> redo logs unless +APPEND Oracle insert hint is used.
> See https://oracle-base.com/articles/misc/append-hint for examples.
> Please add an option for sqoop to generate insert statements in Oracle with 
> APPEND statement. Our databases are swamped with redo/archived logs whenever 
> we sqoop data to them. This is easily avoidable. And from business 
> prospective sqooping to staging tables in nologgin mode is totally fine.
> Thank you.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to