-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59346/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated July 19, 2017, 4:08 p.m.)
Review request for Sqoop, Boglarka Egyed, Attila Szabo, and Szabolcs Vasas.
Changes
-------
proper naming convention
Bugs: PARQUET-1010 and SQOOP-3178
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1010
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-3178
Repository: sqoop-trunk
Description
-------
New feature for sqoop-1: Sqoop Merge and Incremental Merge for Parquet File
Format
Diffs (updated)
-----
src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/MergeGenericRecordExportMapper.java
PRE-CREATION
src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/MergeJob.java 8b1cba33
src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/MergeParquetMapper.java PRE-CREATION
src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/MergeParquetReducer.java PRE-CREATION
src/java/org/apache/sqoop/tool/ImportTool.java 78c7758e
src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestMerge.java 114e934a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59346/diff/10/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59346/diff/9-10/
Testing
-------
Hi,
I have written a Sqoop Merge and Incremental Merge MR for Parquet File Format
and I have tested with million records of data with N number of iterations.
Please review My patch.
THIS ISSUE HAS DEPENDANCY ON PARQUET BUG. SO I HAVE RESOLVED THE PARQUET ISSUE
AND CREATED A PATCH FOR IT HERE
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1010
Please let me know if there are any mistakes in My patch
Thanks,
Sandish Kumar HN
