[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16640442#comment-16640442
 ] 

Devin G. Bost edited comment on SQOOP-1312 at 10/5/18 11:23 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

I was able to reproduce the problem. I just ran this code block (and yes, I 
know, it's a terribly designed unit test because I didn't use mocks or decouple 
dependencies, etc., but I just wanted to get somewhere on this because Java is 
not my primary language), and to my surprise, all of the assertions passed. 
{quote} 
{code:java}
@Test
public void SplitsCorrectly(){

    double minVal = 98.0;
    double maxVal = 2593466.0;

    // Use this as a hint. May need an extra task if the size doesn't
    // divide cleanly.
    int numSplits = 4;
    double splitSize = (maxVal - minVal) / (double) numSplits; // splitSize 
should equal 648342.0

    if (splitSize < MIN_INCREMENT) {
        splitSize = MIN_INCREMENT;
    }
    String colName = "TESTCOLUMN";
    String lowClausePrefix = colName + " >= ";
    String highClausePrefix = colName + " < ";

    double curLower = minVal;
    double curUpper = curLower + splitSize;
    List<Pair<String, String>> listOfBounds = new ArrayList<Pair<String, 
String>>();

    while (curUpper < maxVal) {
        listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));
        //splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
         //       lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower),
          //      highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));

        curLower = curUpper;
        curUpper += splitSize;
    }

    // Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
    if (curLower <= maxVal || listOfBounds.size() == 1) {
        listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));
        //splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
         //       lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper),
          //      colName + " <= " + Double.toString(maxVal)));
    }
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 98.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
648440.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
1296782.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
1945124.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
648440.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
1296782.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
1945124.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
2593466.0");
}
{code}
{quote}
Then I noticed that I accidentally used this line twice:
{quote}listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(*curLower*), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(*curUpper*)));
{quote}
so I replaced the bottom part with:
{quote}listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(*curUpper*), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(*maxVal*)));
{quote}
(Notice the parameters in the second block should be *curUpper* and *maxVal* 
instead of *curLower* and *curUpper*.)

So, I created a second test method (and yes, I know it needs to be refactored 
to make it cleaner) that matched the current Sqoop code:
{quote} 
{code:java}
@Test
public void SplitsCorrectly2(){

    double minVal = 98.0;
    double maxVal = 2593466.0;

    // Use this as a hint. May need an extra task if the size doesn't
    // divide cleanly.
    int numSplits = 4;
    double splitSize = (maxVal - minVal) / (double) numSplits; // splitSize 
should equal 648342.0

    if (splitSize < MIN_INCREMENT) {
        splitSize = MIN_INCREMENT;
    }
    String colName = "TESTCOLUMN";
    String lowClausePrefix = colName + " >= ";
    String highClausePrefix = colName + " < ";

    double curLower = minVal;
    double curUpper = curLower + splitSize;
    List<Pair<String, String>> listOfBounds = new ArrayList<Pair<String, 
String>>();

    while (curUpper < maxVal) {
        listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));
        //splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
        //       lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower),
        //      highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));

        curLower = curUpper;
        curUpper += splitSize;
    }

    // Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
    if (curLower <= maxVal || listOfBounds.size() == 1) {
        listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curUpper), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(maxVal)));
        //splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
        //       lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper),
        //      colName + " <= " + Double.toString(maxVal)));
    }
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 98.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
648440.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
1296782.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 
1945124.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
648440.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
1296782.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
1945124.0");
    Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 
2593466.0");
}
{code}
{quote}
and sure enough, it failed with:
{quote}java.lang.AssertionError: expected [TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0] but found 
[TESTCOLUMN >= 2593466.0]
 Expected :TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0
 Actual :TESTCOLUMN >= 2593466.0
{quote}
So, what is the intended purpose of the block (from the original code):
{quote} 
{code:java}
if (curLower <= maxVal || splits.size() == 1) {
    splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
            lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper),
            colName + " <= " + Double.toString(maxVal)));
}
{code}
{quote}
?

 

 


was (Author: devin.bost):
I was able to reproduce the problem. I just ran this code block (and yes, I 
know, it's a terribly designed unit test because I didn't use mocks or decouple 
dependencies, etc., but I just wanted to get somewhere on this because Java is 
not my primary language), and to my surprise, all of the assertions passed. 
{quote}@Test
 public void SplitsCorrectly(){

double minVal = 98.0;
 double maxVal = 2593466.0;

// Use this as a hint. May need an extra task if the size doesn't
 // divide cleanly.
 int numSplits = 4;
 double splitSize = (maxVal - minVal) / (double) numSplits; // splitSize should 
equal 648342.0

if (splitSize < MIN_INCREMENT)
Unknown macro: \{ splitSize = MIN_INCREMENT; }
String colName = "TESTCOLUMN";
 String lowClausePrefix = colName + " >= ";
 String highClausePrefix = colName + " < ";

double curLower = minVal;
 double curUpper = curLower + splitSize;
 List<Pair<String, String>> listOfBounds = new ArrayList<Pair<String, 
String>>();

while (curUpper < maxVal)
Unknown macro: \{ listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper))); 
//splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit( // 
lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower), // highClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curUpper))); curLower = curUpper; curUpper += splitSize; }
// Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
 if (curLower <= maxVal || listOfBounds.size() == 1)
Unknown macro: \{ listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper))); 
//splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit( // 
lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper), // colName + " <= " + 
Double.toString(maxVal))); }
Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 98.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 648440.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 1296782.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 648440.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 1296782.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 1945124.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 2593466.0");
 }
{quote}
Then I noticed that I accidentally used this line twice:
{quote}listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(*curLower*), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(*curUpper*)));
{quote}
so I replaced the bottom part with:
{quote}listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(*curUpper*), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(*maxVal*)));
{quote}
(Notice the parameters in the second block should be *curUpper* and *maxVal* 
instead of *curLower* and *curUpper*.)

So, I created a second test method (and yes, I know it needs to be refactored 
to make it cleaner) that matched the current Sqoop code:
{quote}public void SplitsCorrectly2(){

double minVal = 98.0;
 double maxVal = 2593466.0;

// Use this as a hint. May need an extra task if the size doesn't
 // divide cleanly.
 int numSplits = 4;
 double splitSize = (maxVal - minVal) / (double) numSplits; // splitSize should 
equal 648342.0

if (splitSize < MIN_INCREMENT)
Unknown macro: \{ splitSize = MIN_INCREMENT; }
String colName = "TESTCOLUMN";
 String lowClausePrefix = colName + " >= ";
 String highClausePrefix = colName + " < ";

double curLower = minVal;
 double curUpper = curLower + splitSize;
 List<Pair<String, String>> listOfBounds = new ArrayList<Pair<String, 
String>>();

while (curUpper < maxVal)
Unknown macro: \{ listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curLower), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper))); 
//splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit( // 
lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower), // highClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curUpper))); curLower = curUpper; curUpper += splitSize; }
// Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
 if (curLower <= maxVal || listOfBounds.size() == 1)
Unknown macro: \{ listOfBounds.add(new Pair<String, String>(lowClausePrefix + 
Double.toString(curUpper), highClausePrefix + Double.toString(maxVal))); 
//splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit( // 
lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper), // colName + " <= " + 
Double.toString(maxVal))); }
Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 98.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 648440.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 1296782.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getLeft(), "TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(0).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 648440.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(1).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 1296782.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(2).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 1945124.0");
 Assert.assertEquals(listOfBounds.get(3).getRight(), "TESTCOLUMN < 2593466.0");
 }
{quote}
and sure enough, it failed with:
{quote}java.lang.AssertionError: expected [TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0] but found 
[TESTCOLUMN >= 2593466.0]
 Expected :TESTCOLUMN >= 1945124.0
 Actual :TESTCOLUMN >= 2593466.0
{quote}
So, what is the intended purpose of the block (from the original code):
{quote}// Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
if (curLower <= maxVal || splits.size() == 1) {
 splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
 lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(*curUpper*),
 colName + " <= " + Double.toString(*maxVal*)));
}{quote}
?

 

 

> One of mappers does not load data from mySql if double column is used as 
> split key
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-1312
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1312
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.4, 1.4.6, 1.4.7
>            Reporter: Jong Ho Lee
>            Assignee: Jong Ho Lee
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: splitter.patch, splitter.patch
>
>
> When we used Sqoop to load data from mySQL using one double column as 
> split-key in Samsung SDS,
>   the last mapper did not load data from mySQL at all. 
>   The number of mappers was sometimes increased by 1.
>   I think they were caused by some bugs in FloatSplitter.java
>   For the last split, lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper), may be 
> lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower).
>   In while (curUpper < maxVal) loop, because of round-off error, 
>   minVal + splitSize * numSplits can be smaller than maxVal.
>   Therefore, using for-loop would be better.
>   Attached is a proposed new FloatSplitter.java
> {code}
> /**
>  * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>  * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
>  * distributed with this work for additional information
>  * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
>  * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
>  * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
>  * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>  *
>  *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>  *
>  * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>  * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>  * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>  * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>  * limitations under the License.
>  */
> // modified by Jongho Lee at Samsung SDS.
> package org.apache.sqoop.mapreduce.db;
> import java.sql.ResultSet;
> import java.sql.SQLException;
> import java.util.ArrayList;
> import java.util.List;
> import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
> import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
> import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration;
> import org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.InputSplit;
> import com.cloudera.sqoop.config.ConfigurationHelper;
> import com.cloudera.sqoop.mapreduce.db.DBSplitter;
> import com.cloudera.sqoop.mapreduce.db.DataDrivenDBInputFormat;
> /**
>  * Implement DBSplitter over floating-point values.
>  */
> public class FloatSplitter implements DBSplitter  {
>   private static final Log LOG = LogFactory.getLog(FloatSplitter.class);
>   private static final double MIN_INCREMENT = 10000 * Double.MIN_VALUE;
>   public List<InputSplit> split(Configuration conf, ResultSet results,
>       String colName) throws SQLException {
>     LOG.warn("Generating splits for a floating-point index column. Due to 
> the");
>     LOG.warn("imprecise representation of floating-point values in Java, 
> this");
>     LOG.warn("may result in an incomplete import.");
>     LOG.warn("You are strongly encouraged to choose an integral split 
> column.");
>     List<InputSplit> splits = new ArrayList<InputSplit>();
>     if (results.getString(1) == null && results.getString(2) == null) {
>       // Range is null to null. Return a null split accordingly.
>       splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
>           colName + " IS NULL", colName + " IS NULL"));
>       return splits;
>     }
>     double minVal = results.getDouble(1);
>     double maxVal = results.getDouble(2);
>     // Use this as a hint. May need an extra task if the size doesn't
>     // divide cleanly.
>     int numSplits = ConfigurationHelper.getConfNumMaps(conf);
>     double splitSize = (maxVal - minVal) / (double) numSplits;
>     if (splitSize < MIN_INCREMENT) {
>       splitSize = MIN_INCREMENT;
>     }
>     String lowClausePrefix = colName + " >= ";
>     String highClausePrefix = colName + " < ";
>     double curLower = minVal;
>     double curUpper = curLower + splitSize;
>     for (int i = 0; i < numSplits - 1; i++) {
>       // while (curUpper < maxVal) {  // changed to for loop
>       splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
>           lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower),
>           highClausePrefix + Double.toString(curUpper)));
>       curLower = curUpper;
>       curUpper += splitSize;
>     }
>     // Catch any overage and create the closed interval for the last split.
>     if (curLower <= maxVal || splits.size() == 1) {
>       splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
>           lowClausePrefix + Double.toString(curLower),
>           colName + " <= " + Double.toString(maxVal)));
>       // curUpper -> curLower // changed
>     }
>     if (results.getString(1) == null || results.getString(2) == null) {
>       // At least one extrema is null; add a null split.
>       splits.add(new DataDrivenDBInputFormat.DataDrivenDBInputSplit(
>           colName + " IS NULL", colName + " IS NULL"));
>     }
>     return splits;
>   }
> }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to