Hi Fabian,

the ontology manager could use a release, there are many new features since 0.9.0-incubating.

plus, there's the OntoNet API renaming issue underway, so perhaps this could be an intermediate release with both APIs for some backwards compatibility, and then a further release will phase out the deprecated API.

note however that it requires an updated commons.owl too, but it's even better to have it with the OWL API from Maven-central (waiting for a compatible OWL 2 reasoner [1]). Also the reasoners.web bundle should be re-released.

Do we make releases for specific commons at all?

I think November would be good for submitting RC's. Right now I'm busy writing my thesis, then I plan to finalize the API renaming and add a few more unit/integration tests so I can check some details in the improved features and close their tickets.

Alessandro

[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAD2jOMN2YegVbJTchud-U4YQCzbyo%2B%3DJhciO7sYD%2Btg0U5A3Yg%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=owlapi-developer


On 10/11/12 11:10 PM, Fabian Christ wrote:
Hi,

I am investigating the components that should go for a release in the
near future. We should try to bring as much components to a 1.0 status
as possible. After graduation it would be a good sign to start and
establish a release cycle.

My first release candidate would be the Enhancer with all Enhancement
Engines. So I will check the Enhancer and engines if all requirements
for a release are met (license, POMs, etc).

What about other components? Please, make suggestions as I do not have
a detailed overview of the status of all the code parts and branches.

Best,
  - Fabian



--
M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Department of Computer Science
Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy

Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
National Research Council (CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy


"I will give you everything, just don't demand anything."
(Ettore Petrolini, 1917)

Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice

Reply via email to