The original issue was about whether migrating (part of) Clerezza into
Stanbol made sense. The concern raised was resourcing.
Coupling this to new API design is making the resourcing more of a
problem, not less.
If I understand the discussion ....
Short term::
Can Clerezza achieve graduation?
Or not, does splitting out the part of Clerezza that Stanbol depends on
work? (I sense "yes" with little work needed). Maintaining such
transferred code was raised as a concern - e.g. SPARQL 1.1 access.
Long term::
Where does this leave Stanbol? Does the maintenance cost concern
remain? or even get worse?
I don't have sufficient knowledge of the codebase to know what the
balance is between fine-grained API work and query-based access (and
update).
How important is switching between (e.g.) storage providers?
(local storage - remote would be SPARQL so stanbol-client-code and
other-server can be chosen separately - that's why we do standards!)
Andy
