2012/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > > I would prefer to keep the default really simple. If people want security > > they have to do something for it. This is true for most systems and > > frameworks that I know about. > > > Well don't know so many systems. What comes to mind is the db of the world > economic forum (WEF), which by being started the default way exposed Bill > Gates's Credit card number ;) > > Otherwise even windows no longer logs me in as administrator without > password by default.
So you are comparing Stanbol with end user products. IMO this compare does not fit very well. Stanbol as a project delivers components that can be used to built different kinds of semantic systems. It is not a product ready to use out of the box in productive environments. And I do not think it will ever be such one. You have to integrate Stanbol at some level. Security is one aspect of such integration work in my view. One of the best things in Stanbol is the aspect that I can use what I want and exclude the rest. Having security activated by default is against this concept. Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
