2012/11/28 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > I fully agree. My suggestion is that if somebody decides to have security > as part of their launcher they should not have to additionally enable it. >
Maybe I did not understand your request before: Now I understand to enable security I have to a) add the bundles b) use the -s option And now you would like to remove the -s option? So that enabling security is just a matter of adding the bundles and it is activated? If people do not want security they remove the bundles from their launchers. > The full launcher is there that developers can see if their component work > together well with all the others (this includes security). > If the above is true, I would agree with that. I have no problem of bloating the full launcher with everything we have. The name indicates it ;) -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
