Thanks Rupert,

I will try to apply your patches to the base revision I am working on.

Thank you for your help.

Regards
Andrea

2012/12/13 Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I created STANBOL-841 for this. I also discovered some issues with
> STANBOL-828 [2] when running Stanbol as WAR and reopened this issue.
>
> I plan to commit a first version that will allow to run Stanbol with
> the Servlet API 3.0 shortly. While this will bring initial support
> there is still an issue if the Sling Installer framework that needs
> further investigation
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-841
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-828
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Andrea
>>
>> As correctly noticed by you Stanbol has adopted consumer (=++) and
>> provider (==+) version range policies some time ago. This means that
>> packages that are used allow all version until the next major release.
>> Packages that are provided (e.g. a package of an Interface that is
>> implemented by an module the provider policy needs to be used.
>>
>> There is a good reason for those version ranges as
>>
>> * major version changes might break backward compatibility and
>> * minor version changes might add additional methods to an interface
>> and therefore break implementations
>>
>> Changing the [===,+++) to [===,+++] means that version 3.0.0 is
>> allowed. as soon as version 3.0.1 is released it would again break. So
>> if we come to the conclusion that all stanbol components are in fact
>> compatible with version 3.0.0 of the servlet api, than we need to use
>> [2.5.0,4.0.0). As this will be specific to the servlet api those
>> annotations will need to be explicitly annotated in the Import-Package
>> specification of the pom.xml files importing the servlet API.
>>
>> I am already working on the necessary changes.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andrea Di Menna <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it seems like it is solved applying this change:
>>>
>>> --- a/source/parent/pom.xml
>>> +++ b/source/parent/pom.xml
>>> @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@
>>>                <Bundle-Vendor>Apache Stanbol (Incubating)</Bundle-Vendor>
>>>                
>>> <Bundle-SymbolicName>${project.artifactId}</Bundle-SymbolicName>
>>>                <_versionpolicy>$${version;===;${@}}</_versionpolicy>
>>> -              
>>> <_provider-policy>[$(version;===;$(@)),$(version;=+;$(@)))</_provider-policy>
>>> -              
>>> <_consumer-policy>[$(version;===;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@)))</_consumer-policy>
>>> +              
>>> <_provider-policy>[$(version;===;$(@)),$(version;=+;$(@))]</_provider-policy>
>>> +              
>>> <_consumer-policy>[$(version;===;$(@)),$(version;+;$(@))]</_consumer-policy>
>>>            </instructions>
>>>          </configuration>
>>>        </plugin>
>>>
>>> Those policies have been added in rev 1399264
>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1399264) and
>>> discussed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-774
>>>
>>> However the change I applied locally should have an impact not only on
>>> javax.servlet version ranges, but also on other bundles.
>>> I am not sure this is the correct solution.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> 2012/12/12 Fabian Christ <[email protected]>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I did not check if it is still working for a while. I have seen that there
>>>> were changes in Stanbol POMs regarding the servlet-api version but I did
>>>> not had a closer look.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it is really broken with newer versions of Stanbol.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody with a working version out there?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>  - Fabian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/12/12 Andrea Di Menna <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am building a Stanbol full-war from SVN rev 1399264.
>>>>> Building is successfully, and everything is working on my local
>>>>> machine, which has Tomcat 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> When trying to deploy the same war file on a remote server which has
>>>>> Tomcat 7 in it, I get failures with the following reasons:
>>>>>
>>>>> SEVERE: ERROR: Error starting
>>>>> slinginstall:org.apache.stanbol.commons.ldviewable-0.10.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>>>>> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
>>>>> org.apache.stanbol.commons.ldviewable
>>>>>  [90]: Unable to resolve 90.0: missing requirement [90.0] package;
>>>>> (&(package=freemarker.cache)(version>=2.3.19)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>>>>> [caused by: Unable to resolve 112.0: missing requirement [112.0]
>>>>> package;
>>>>> (&(package=javax.servlet)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))])
>>>>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
>>>>> org.apache.stanbol.commons.ldviewable [90]: Unable to resolve 90.0:
>>>>> missing requirement [90.0] package;
>>>>> (&(package=freemarker.cache)(versio
>>>>> n>=2.3.19)(!(version>=3.0.0))) [caused by: Unable to resolve 112.0:
>>>>> missing requirement [112.0] package;
>>>>> (&(package=javax.servlet)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))]
>>>>>         at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundle(Felix.java:3443)
>>>>>         at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1727)
>>>>>         at
>>>>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1156)
>>>>>         at
>>>>> org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264)
>>>>>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Other bundles cannot be started mainly because of:
>>>>>
>>>>> missing requirement [112.0] package;
>>>>> (&(package=javax.servlet)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))])
>>>>>
>>>>> Tomcat 7 is providing serlvet-api.3.0.jar while Tomcat 6 has
>>>>> servlet-api.2.5.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> From past posts, I read people could use Stanbol with Tomcat 7 (e.g.
>>>>> Fabian) so I cannot understand what is going wrong with my
>>>>> installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anybody help me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabian
>>>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to