Hi, the directory name should fit the artifact name. Otherwise it is just confusing when searching in the code tree for the artifact. That's why I did the renaming of "ldpathtemplate" because the artifact was named like this.
I have also seen directories with a dot "." in the name like "base.jersey". I have not see such a use of dots in directory names before and to me this is also a bit confusing. Maybe because of the Java convention using the dot as a package / directory splitter. It is always a good idea to ask the community for naming suggestions if unsure about the name before bringing it in the code base. Best, - Fabian 2012/12/18 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > I've just resolved STANBOL-843 which required some artifacts to be renamed. > > Also I've seen that the directory ldtemplaterenderer has been renamed to > ldpathtemplate in r1420603 to match the naming in the pom. > > This raises two point: > - Are there strict rules on the artifact-id to directory mapping? > - "ldpathtemplate" as a name might be a bit misleading as one might expect > a working bundleization of ldpathtemplate but in fact it's a service > rendering graphnodes using ldpathtemplate. So maybe it would be better to > rename the artifact. > > Cheers, > Reto > -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
