I'm a Fedora Commons committer and very interested in this question myself.
Actually, it's perfectly possible to connect Fedora Commons to Stanbol in ways
that don't involve JMS. I'm not familiar with the details of Acuity Unlimited's
approach, but I'm not sure they used JMS and I know I didn't. {grin} But
neither group was particularly interested in Stanbol's content-enhancement
components.
I used Fedora's content-modelling architecture to define behaviors for object
representing Stanbol EntityHubs, then used the facility for dynamic
disseminations to support those behaviors with actual Stanbol-housed
vocabularies. I'd be happy to talk off-list with you about it.
---
A. Soroka
Software & Systems Engineering :: Online Library Environment
the University of Virginia Library
On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Stanbol but have been working for some time with a Fedora Commons
> based repository. So I read with interest the discussion about integrating
> the two [1] [2]. I have also explored an online demo from Acuity unlimited
> [3]. Clearly, any type of integration will leverage Fedora's JMS messaging
> system, but I was curious if there is any more concrete documentation about
> how the two systems could be connected? There was also a reference to using
> Clerezza for storing large ontologies (i.e. Getty ULAN)[4] -- are there more
> details about this that someone could share?
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Aaron Coburn
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stanbol-dev/201109.mbox/%3csig.62544f4c36.001401cc7f79$4e913010$0901010a@asusp5w%3e
>
> [2] http://blog.iks-project.eu/fedora-gets-semantic-with-apache-stanbol/
>
> [3]
> http://fedora-stanbol.acuityunlimited.net:18080/orbeon/stanbol-fedora/data-browser
>
> [4]
> http://blog.iks-project.eu/fedora-and-stanbol-integration-early-technology-demo/
