On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Please just restore the original LdRenderer service an the >> corresponding version of the UserManager. We can add an >> RdfViewablRenderer service later, I think its overarchitecture to >> separate out the LDVieable implementation. But first things first: >> restore the better status quo ante with the Ldrenderer. > > LDRenderer was in ldpathtemplate; I created a new module, added those > to bundlelists (both in trunk and a branch); changed exports and > import statements that are now conflicting with an lot of additional > changes I made while working on STANBOL-924 and STANBOL-927. Sorry I > think reverting is no longer an option as it would take longer as > implementing the service as suggested above.
I think we should avoid working on an issue while dependent issues aren't resolved. Also removing the LDRenderer service was not something which was clear that this would happen neither from the description of the issue nor from the discussion on the list. As you refuse to do it, I'll read the LdRenderer service (using your new TemplateLoader service) so that UserManager can be reverted to where the code was both more elegant and working. Reto > > best > Rupert > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen
