On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Fabian Christ <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi, > > is the functionality implemented in commons? The resolution of STAANBOL-936 was in commons.web. Maybe the easiest would just be a rename from "Web UI" to "Web". As we don't intend to spend lot of effort in UI design I think having all in this component would be fine. Cheers, Reto > Then it would be commons > at the moment. The "Web UI" component is not really helpful and yes - > maybe we need some new structure. > > I tried to align the components in JIRA with the releases we have cut. > It was just an attempt to easily find out which issues can be closed > after a release. Otherwise it can be really time consuming to filter > issues and decide if they are reflected by a new release of some > component. > > For releases it is a mapping problem: > Release -> JIRA component -> physical artifacts -> code changes > > JIRA issues are described sometimes on the level of a JIRA component, > sometimes a physical artifact. Often it is the case that a single > issue addresses more than one JIRA component and/or artifacts. > > If a new component is introduced, like "REST infrastructure", it would > be good to find this component also in the SVN directory and that > there exists a reactor that builds just this component. That makes > release cutting easy. > > Best, > - Fabian > > 2013/2/18 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Looking to assign STANBOL-944 to the right component in jira I found > > nothing suitable. "Web" would be appropriate, "REST" would be too but > "Web > > UI" seems clearly wrong as the "U" in "UI" is typically thought as a > human > > user. > > > > One possibility would be to introduce a new component "REST > infrastructure". > > > > Cheers, > > Reto > > > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt >
