On 19.02.13 15:01, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Hi Reto,
> Am I right that http://vocab.netlabs.org/recipe#ingredient_domain > points to the property that should be expanded? In the simplest case > this would be an equilvalent to the query-param xPropObj. What we > would also need is the inverse, i.e. an equivalent to xProSubj. In > your example you might also want to expand the resource which has an > eg:employ property pointing to you. Good point, in the foaf:knows case this could be the people which foaf:know the foaf:Person I care about one could expand them too. I'm actually not supper happy with the terms I've choosen back then, maybe it's time to change that. What about ingredientProperty and ingredientInverseProperty? cu Adrian
