Hi Bertrand, Recent user questions show that Stanbol is not working as well as it > did for the "user wants to just play with this with a minimum of fuss" > scenario. >
Which user questions are you referring to? > > Let's see what others think - for now my suggestion is to rename the > "full" launcher to "secure" and have all the other launchers use > -no-security as the default (which might already be the case). > Yes, this is already the case. Id it is to be renamed I'd suggest "-devel" rather than "-secure" to emphasize that this is the one that should be used for developing. But I think full is a better name as it has all the features enabled, A "launcher-devel" could also be a minimal launcher with only the commons and security enabled. Reto > > -Bertrand > > > 1. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stanbol-dev/201211.mbox/%3CCALvhUEXNFcvNroS=r40ct37d2h+90zvt8x_p8x_gj6mde7+...@mail.gmail.com%3E >
