On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> wrote: > The fact that Solr did a release with these deps does not imply that > it is okay in principle. > > I am +0 here. It may be reasonable to allow it temporarily but only if > there are clear signs that the situation will change in the near > future. Otherwise such deps should IMO be avoided. >
I fully agree, but what are the alternatives? For Apache Stanbol it is not possible to avoid Solr and also staying with outdated Lucene/Solr version seams also not to be a great Idea. I will definitely keep an eye on this. Maybe Tommaso (as Solr/Lucene committer) can also further investigate / track this. best Rupert > Best, > - Fabian > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
