On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi Rupert >> > >> > I'm sorry that I missed that thread. I retract my request to revert the >> > code. >> > >> > According to >> > >> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html: >> > >> > "Only releases can be uploaded to the central repository, that means >> files >> > that won't change and that only depend on other files already released >> and >> > available in the repository." >> > >> > But >> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Central+Sync+Requirementsis >> > a bit less strict: >> > >> > "Besides, we *discourage* putting release repository/pluginRepository in >> > your POM. In ideal conditions, all your dependencies should be already >> in >> > central and central repository is self-contained. Otherwise people's >> build >> > might break because of missing dependencies. If some of your >> dependencies >> > are not in central, please upload them using our 3rd-party artifacts >> bundle >> > upload service< >> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+The+Central+Repository >> > >> > ." >> > >> > Maybe we can avoid the need for the repository by excluding those >> > transitive dependencies? >> > >> >> As stated in the other thread it is not possible to avoid this >> dependency as it is directly used by the solr-core module >> > > I understand that solr core has this dependency. My assumption is that not > all features provided by solr-core depend on this so that even if we > exclude this dependency as with > > <dependency> > <groupId>...</groupId> > <artifactId>...</artifactId> > <exclusions> > <exclusion> > <artifactId>.... > <groupId>... > </exclusion> > </exclusions> > > and suppress the respective import-package we would still have the > functionality we actually need. > > Ok, I know saw the other thread. So if we need the solr rest-service we also need this dependency. > Cheers, > Reto > > >> best >> Rupert >> >> > Cheers, >> > Reto >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Rupert Westenthaler < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Rupert, >> >> > >> >> > Could you revert this change so that we can do a release of it >> first? The >> >> > experience is that it takes a while till dependencies go into maven >> >> central >> >> > so that after this update it might not be possible to release the >> module >> >> > for quite a while. >> >> > >> >> >> >> I do not see that this is a problem for a release as the Solr project >> >> was also able to release 4.2.0 and 4.2.1. Also deployment on Maven >> >> Central should not be a problem, as also >> >> org.apache.solr:solr-core:4.2.0 as well as version 4.2.1 are on maven >> >> central and clearly show the dependency. Also deploying artifacts with >> >> other maven repositories than maven central is no longer a problem, >> >> because the the solr-parent does exactly that. >> >> >> >> Your fear was exactly the reason why I started this thread [1] and if >> >> the outcome would be that is is indeed a problem, that I fully agree >> >> with you that we should revert those changes until this is fixed by >> >> Solr (meaning that Restlet is available on Maven Central). >> >> >> >> If there are additional questions, opinions about dependencies that >> >> are not available on Maven Central, please use [1]. Having this >> >> discussion in two threads will make it much harder for others to >> >> follow. >> >> >> >> best >> >> Rupert >> >> >> >> [1] http://stanbol.markmail.org/thread/awla77qdzlirqqrx >> >> >> >> >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Reto >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür (JIRA) >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> [ >> >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13629169#comment-13629169 >> >> ] >> >> >> >> >> >> Reto Bachmann-Gmür commented on STANBOL-1026: >> >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> Please release the previous version before changing this. Because of >> >> this >> >> >> external maven repository it might last a long while till the >> updated >> >> >> version can be released. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Update commons.solr to Solr 4.2.1 >> >> >> > --------------------------------- >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Key: STANBOL-1026 >> >> >> > URL: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1026 >> >> >> > Project: Stanbol >> >> >> > Issue Type: Improvement >> >> >> > Components: Commons >> >> >> > Reporter: Rupert Westenthaler >> >> >> > Assignee: Rupert Westenthaler >> >> >> > Priority: Minor >> >> >> > >> >> >> > This will update the Lucene/Solr version used by Stanbol form 4.1 >> to >> >> >> 4.2.1 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> >> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA >> >> >> administrators >> >> >> For more information on JIRA, see: >> >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] >> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> > >
