I set maxpermsize and it looks a lot better, thanks.
With Sun JDK 1.7: WARNING: The following warnings have been detected with resource and/or provider classes: WARNING: A HTTP GET method, public void org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.permissioncheck.PermissionCheck.checkPermission(java.lang.String), MUST return a non-void type. Apr 25, 2013 9:25:38 PM com.sun.jersey.server.impl.application.WebApplicationImpl _initiate INFO: Initiating Jersey application, version 'Jersey: 1.15 10/30/2012 02:40 PM' Apr 25, 2013 9:25:40 PM com.sun.jersey.spi.inject.Errors processErrorMessages WARNING: The following warnings have been detected with resource and/or provider classes: WARNING: A HTTP GET method, public void org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.permissioncheck.PermissionCheck.checkPermission(java.lang.String), MUST return a non-void type. 25.04.2013 21:25:40.304 *INFO * [main] Startup completed With OpenJDK 1.7: WARNING: The following warnings have been detected with resource and/or provider classes: WARNING: A HTTP GET method, public void org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.permissioncheck.PermissionCheck.checkPermission(java.lang.String), MUST return a non-void type. Apr 25, 2013 9:32:51 PM com.sun.jersey.server.impl.application.WebApplicationImpl _initiate INFO: Initiating Jersey application, version 'Jersey: 1.15 10/30/2012 02:40 PM' Apr 25, 2013 9:32:52 PM com.sun.jersey.spi.inject.Errors processErrorMessages WARNING: The following warnings have been detected with resource and/or provider classes: WARNING: A HTTP GET method, public void org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.permissioncheck.PermissionCheck.checkPermission(java.lang.String), MUST return a non-void type. 25.04.2013 21:32:52.696 *INFO * [main] Startup completed Is this warning serious? Thanks, Mike On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Alessandro Adamou <ada...@cs.unibo.it> wrote: > Launched fine here on r1475855 and the following environment > > Maven 3.0.4 > OpenJDK 1.6.0_24 i386 > CrunchBang Linux i386 kernel 3.2.0-4-686-pae > > ...but before we investigate further: are those all the arguments you've set > for your JVM/Stanbol? > > did you ever set the permanent generation size? The default is not enough for > the full launcher. If you did not set it, it might just by chance have gone > out of memory at the time of activating the ontologymanager.servicesapi > bundle. > > Try also to pass > > -XX:MaxPermSize=192m > > alongside the max heap ( -Xmx) > > IIRC from my VisualVM benchmarks, 192 megabytes is kind of a borderline value > for the full launcher. If it is not enough, try 256m or 320m but try to be > conservative. If you are not activating additional custom bundles, you won't > need a larger permanent generation than the one necessary for getting Stanbol > running. > > Best, > Alessandro > > > On 25/04/2013 18:02, Alessandro Adamou wrote: >> That's odd. Let me try a fresh rebuild/launch. >> >> Alessandro >> >> >> On 25/04/2013 18:00, MJ wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I searched the mailing list archives, but didn't find any useful tips to >>> resolve my problem. >>> >>> I built the subversion snapshot using Maven 3 and Sun JDK 1.7 on FreeBSD >>> using Linux emulation layer. I tried to run with Sun JDK, but alas >>> KqueueSelectorProvider is non-existent, so I switched to running with >>> OpenJDK since I really need the event-based I/O. >>> >>> Anyhow, I tried starting Stanbol with Sun JDK 1.7, OpenJDK 1.6, and OpenJDK >>> 1.7, all with exactly the same problem. >>> >>> >>> The startup command line: >>> >>> /usr/local/openjdk7/bin/java -Xmx1g -jar >>> /usr/local/infra/stanbol-svn/launchers/full/target/org.apache.stanbol.launchers.full-0.10.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> >>> >>> >>> The problem: >>> >>> >>> ERROR: Bundle org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.refactor [40]: Error >>> starting >>> slinginstall:org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.refactor-0.10.0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>> org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.refactor [40]: Unable to resolve 40.0: >>> missing requirement [40.0] package; >>> (&(package=org.apache.stanbol.ontologymanager.servicesapi.collector)(version>=0.10.0)(!(version>=1.0.0)))) >>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>> org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.refactor [40]: Unable to resolve 40.0: >>> missing requirement [40.0] package; >>> (&(package=org.apache.stanbol.ontologymanager.servicesapi.collector)(version>=0.10.0)(!(version>=1.0.0))) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundle(Felix.java:3443) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1727) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:1156) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:264) >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) >>> 25.04.2013 19:42:16.289 *INFO * [main] Startup completed >>> >>> >>> >>> I would be highly appreciative if somebody would advise me on how to get >>> the Ontology Manager going. The Ontology Manager is actually the most >>> important reason for my using Stanbol. >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Mike >> >> > > > -- > Alessandro Adamou, Ph.D. > > Knowledge Media Institute > The Open University > Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA > United Kingdom > > Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna > Department of Computer Science > Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna > Italy > > > "I will give you everything, just don't demand anything." > (Ettore Petrolini, 1917) > > Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice >
