Hi Alessandro Thanks for the reply. I've committed a fix for the default IRI and a temporary fix for the security issues.
Is there an easy way to get the merge of two uploaded graphs? Cheersd, Reto On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alessandro Adamou <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Reto, > > sorry for the delay, I was on a business trip when you wrote this. > > What you actually did when you issued > > > curl -D - -X PUT > "http://localhost:8080/**ontonet/ontology/User<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User> >> " >> > > was not to create an ontology, but a container for ontologies, or Scope, > used for tailoring OWL interpretation and reasoning - although in the > strict sense it is an ontology because all containers can be exported to > RDF or native OWL as you noticed. > > You were misled by the ambiguous RESTful API naming scheme, I am still to > refactor that but it will become > > [stanbol]/ontology/scope/User > > To create an ontology, not managed by a scope, you can currently PUT to > something like > > [stanbol]/ontonet/http://my.**ontology/name <http://my.ontology/name> > > or > > [stanbol]/ontonet/**simpleontologyname > > and POST triples there > > which is why I'm a little surprised you managed to upload triples like this > > > curl -u admin:admin -H "Content-type: text/turtle" -D - -X POST -d >> @contacts.nt >> http://localhost:8080/ontonet/**ontology/User<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User> >> > > Perhaps there should either be some code to prevent it, or maybe allow the > population of ontology containers directly. > > The reason why you get this import tree: > > > Now > http://localhost:8080/ontonet/**ontology/User<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User>imports >> http://localhost:8080/ontonet/**ontology/User/custom<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User/custom>which >> in turm imports >> http://localhost:8080/ontonet/**ontology/User/org.apache.** >> stanbol.ontologymanager.**sources.clerezza.** >> GraphContentInputSource-time:**1369068440168which<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User/org.apache.stanbol.ontologymanager.sources.clerezza.GraphContentInputSource-time:1369068440168which> >> contains the uploaded information plus some T-Box data and imports >> http://localhost:8080/ontonet/**ontology/User/core<http://localhost:8080/ontonet/ontology/User/core>which >> is an empty ontology. >> > > is that a scope creates an internal hierarchy for laying out ontologies. > If laid out correctly, this guarantees that triples that should be OWL > object property assertions are unexpectedly resolved as annotations (which > is what the plain OWL API would do). > > The non-IRI entry you see is an automatic fallback when all of the > followig hold: > * the uploaded triples do not have any ontology naming statements, and > * you uploaded them from a datastream and not from a URL, and > * you did not provide an arbitrary name for the ontology > > If you proceed as above you won't get this. > > > - Is there a way to have ontonet inline these imports so that I get back >> the union of the uploaded ontologies? >> > > I did some code back then, that allowed query parameter "merge=true" in > the GETs to return imported triples for some formats. > > Just noticed that my /ontonet page is showing an error where the list of >> ontologies should be shown: >> >> get(ontologies) failed on instance of >> org.apache.stanbol.**ontologymanager.web.resources.** >> OntoNetRootResourceThe >> problematic instruction:----------==> assignment: >> >> ontologies=it.ontologies [on line 71, column 3 in >> html/org/apache/stanbol/**ontologymanager/web/resources/** >> OntoNetRootResource/webview.**ftl] >> in include "webview.ftl" [on line 35, column 7 in >> html/org/apache/stanbol/**ontologymanager/web/resources/** >> OntoNetRootResource/index] >> in user-directive common.page [on line 21, column 3 in >> html/org/apache/stanbol/**ontologymanager/web/resources/** >> OntoNetRootResource/index]----**------ >> (...) >> > > I do not know the impact that the introduction of security had on this, > but it might also be due to mixing up the scope management and ontology > management, since it's trying to treat /ontology/User both as a scope and > as a regular ontology. > > HTH > > Alessandro > > -- > Alessandro Adamou, Ph.D. > > Knowledge Media Institute > The Open University > Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA > United Kingdom > > Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna > Department of Computer Science > Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna > Italy > > > "I will give you everything, just don't demand anything." > (Ettore Petrolini, 1917) > > Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice > >
