I would like to see the stanbol archetypes in the release. Cheers, Reto On Jun 5, 2013 1:06 PM, "Rupert Westenthaler" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Fabian Christ > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ...No releases were published since March 2013 report.... > > > > It's good to indicate when the last release was. > > > > This reminded me that we should work on the next Stanbol release(s). > > Please use this thread to list components that should be released. On > my list are > > (1) commons.solr.* > > The upgrade to Solr4 is a major improvement and yet to be released. > > (2) enhancer & enhancement-engines > > We created branches for 0.10.1 releases to prepare incompatible API > changes for EnhancementProperties. However until now we have not made > this changes and also not done any changes to the branches. Because of > that I would suggest that we do a maintenance release of those > components (0.10.1) by updating the branches from the trunk. > > This release will also include some additional EnhancementEngines. IMO > those should be released using the 0.10.1 version tag (even that there > is no 0.10.0). > > (3) entityhub > > While we pushed the trunk version after the last release from 0.11.0 > to 0.12.0 there where no major changes. Therefore I would like to > forge a 0.11.1 release of the entityhub from an own branch instead of > a 0.12.0 from the trunk. > > (4) binary release > > I would like to release a Stanbol Launcher that does not include the > default configuration and can therefore be released as binary > artifact. While such a launcher would not be great for demo purposes > IMO it is important to have a released version that can be used by > users to create their own customized launcher configurations. > > > best > Rupert > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >
