thanks so much Rupert for your reaponse.

i recently joined dev community so wasnt aware of this issue reported
earlier also.

thanks again and i will try out work around options you have suggested amd
will revert if some more help is needed

best regards
tarandeep
On Jul 23, 2013 7:57 PM, "Rupert Westenthaler" <
rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tarandeep,
>
> this Issue does not appear the first time here on the list. So you
> might also want to search the archives for more information.
>
> When using the Felix Webconsole to configure an OSGI component the
> size of the configuration MUST NOT exceed the headerBufferSize [1] of
> the embedded Jetty server. For more information see FELIX-3265 [2].
> The problem is that with the currently released version of the Jetty
> plugin it is not possible to configure the headerBufferSize.
>
> To workaround this limitation you have three possibilities:
>
> 1. reduce the size of the configuration (e.g. by removing comment
> lines from the field mappings)
> 2. configure the Site using the configuration file located in
> "stanbol/fileinstall". Make sure that changes to the file confirm to
> the syntax required by the *.config files
> 3. running Stanbol as WAR within a Tomcat. In Tomcat you can configure
> the headerBufferSize like explained in [3]
>
> I usually use option (2)
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
> [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Configuring+Connectors
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3265
> [3]
> http://serverfault.com/questions/56691/whats-the-maximum-url-length-in-tomcat
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney
> <tsawh...@innodata.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are facing an issue while adding field mappings beyond 12-14 fields as
> > defined in EntityHubLinking Engine property *"Fields used for
> > dereferencing".*
> > *
> > *
> > We have created our own reference site for additional DBpedia data. But
> > when we try to map properties for dereferenced entities beyond above
> limit,
> > felix throws an error *"ajax head full" *and so we are unable to
> configure
> > all the required field mappings.
> >
> > Can you please provide some help for any workaround or point out
> something
> > that we are missing.
> >
> > best regards,
> > tarandeep
> >
> > --
> >
> > "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
> > of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary
> or
> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
> > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>

-- 

"This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or 
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, 
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in 
reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."

Reply via email to