Solr 4.4.0 supports schema-less mode as well :) Maybe the community should focus on supporting that version of Solr first? :)
Cheers Andrea 2013/9/5 Joseph M'Bimbi-Bene <jbi...@object-ive.com> > Sorry for not answering. Ahah actually i don't much more elaborate reason > than "ElasticSearch is cool". > I don't know them in depth enough but since it seems to be increasingly > used and in the company i work, pretty much every thing is migrating to > ElasticSearch, i figured it would be nice to have an ElasticSearch yard to > put every data in the same place. > > Besides the schemaless thing and a supposed (as far as i'm concerned) > better scalability i have to admit don't know much about the differences > and you are making me doubt about the relevance of such a feature. > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Sergio Fernández < > sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > > > So...? Beyond trying to cut the discussion on the proposal, my intent was > > to hear arguments in its favour ;-) > > > > > > On 02/09/13 15:58, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> the proposal sounds cool, indeed. But I'd like to have more arguments > >> than a mere trend because a new product appeared. > >> > >> I know some of those arguments in favour Elastic Search vs. Apache Solr. > >> But, from my understanding, Stanbol just uses Solr because is internally > >> convenient for what the EntityHub and other components need. And, > >> although the REST API is publicly exposed, that's not its main purpose, > >> and could be removed without affecting any core feature. > >> > >> Therefore, I'd be happy to listen some arguments that such contribution > >> would actually improve something in Stanbol. Could be performance, > >> flexibility, etc, but something more than "Elastic Search is cool!", you > >> know. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> > >> On 02/09/13 15:14, Rupert Westenthaler wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Joseph > >>> > >>> I do not have plans to add an elastic search Yard to the Entiyhub, but > >>> I would definitely be (very) supportive to someone that wants to > >>> implement such a component. > >>> > >>> best > >>> Rupert > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Fabian Christ > >>> <christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> who do you mean when you say "you" ;-) As any Apache project the > Stanbol > >>>> community cares more about people than code. So if you are willing to > >>>> contribute, then you are more than welcome. If you want support for > some > >>>> great new feature, the best is to get engaged and work on it and > provide > >>>> the support. > >>>> > >>>> I have no technical knowledge about elastic search but it sound like > an > >>>> interesting extension for the Entityhub or which component did you > >>>> have in > >>>> mind? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> - Fabian > >>>> Am 30.08.2013 15:05 schrieb "Joseph M'Bimbi-Bene" > >>>> <jbi...@object-ive.com>: > >>>> > >>>> Hello every body, hope i'm not spamming, but with my co-workers we > are > >>>>> working with ElasticSearch for quite a time now and i can definitely > >>>>> see an > >>>>> implementation of the Entityhub based on it. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you think about that. Is there any plan for that ? > >>>>> In the very hypothetical case our company wants to invest resource > >>>>> on such > >>>>> a feature, would you support it ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, Joseph > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > -- > > Sergio Fernández > > Salzburg Research > > +43 662 2288 318 > > Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II > > A-5020 Salzburg (Austria) > > http://www.salzburgresearch.at > > >
