Ok, that give me an incentive to port the integration test by friday. Cheers, Reto
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Fabian Christ < christ.fab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thinking about it - what about defining that this Friday is the end of > development for the 0.x release in trunk. This would mean that I would > create a release branch by end of business on Friday. Then the > ng-branch could directly become the new trunk. > > 2013/10/16 Fabian Christ <christ.fab...@googlemail.com>: > > Hi Reto, > > > > you are right that we had that consensus. The missing release is my > > fault as I do not find the time to cut it. Anyway, the trunk was once > > already in a releasable state but I have to catch up after the recent > > commits. > > > > So, how should we proceed to have a hard deadline for the trunk? Then > > we should create a release branch from trunk for the last 0.x release > > and make the ng-branch the new trunk. > > > > Hopefully, I will have time on Friday to have a closer look at the > > trunk and proceed with release preparation. If there is anybody who > > has the time and the willing to help or even to do the release, please > > do not hesitate to take action. > > > > Best, > > - Fabian > > > > 2013/10/15 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org>: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There hasn't been a lot of discussion regarding the ng-branch. Maybe > >> misinterpreting silence as consent I assumed we would agree that: > >> > >> - We will have the last 0.X release soon (I assumed "Summer 13" to > refer to > >> the one in the northern hemisphere) from trunk > >> - After that commongs-ng will become the new trunk > >> - The modules that are still actively developed are moved to ng > >> > >> As a consequences of this the commits to trunk should be limited to what > >> really should be part of the next release. However there have been lots > of > >> commits (almost all from Rupert) into the trunk branch. Some of the > >> commits, like today's issue and patch to provide a Sesame based > entityhub > >> model for sesame definitively sound like new features than like > pre-release > >> polishing. > >> > >> With rules, ontologymanager, reasoning, having been added during the > last > >> weeks (thanks Enrico) the ng-branch is quite complete. > >> > >> How shall we proceed? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Reto > > > > > > > > -- > > Fabian > > http://twitter.com/fctwitt > > > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt >
