Hi all, I fixed the issue mentioned by Reto [1]. Also reverted an unintentional upgrade to Tika 1.4 [2] in the enhancer bundlelist with [3].
However there is still no progress on the build issues of Andreas. As explained in [4] I can see in the log what is going wrong, but I have still no idea why this is happening in Andreas environment. All my tries to reproduce this where not successful. Still I would suggest to close the trunk for new things ASAP. Release related bug fixes can still be done during the release preparation and while checking/voting for the release candidates. WDYT Rupert [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stanbol-dev/201310.mbox/%3CCALvhUEW8mf0URO8zPBmOzVmti%2Bjqusxa6h7KFK7KwkbNWXW7nQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://svn.apache.org/r1533422 [3] http://svn.apache.org/r1533715 [4] http://markmail.org/message/qkliytcoev7ehidj On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com> wrote: > Hi Reto, > > +1. I just was reviewing my remaining tasks. Agree it is not critical. > > Cheers, > Rafa > > El viernes, 18 de octubre de 2013, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió: > >> Hi Rafa, all, >> >> I think adding Unit Test is certainly not a release critical bugfix. The >> incompatibilities between entityhub components I mentioned before [1] seems >> to me more likely to be release critical. However this could I think as >> well be addressed in a release branch while the main development in trunk >> goes towards 1.0.0. >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> >> 1. >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stanbol-dev/201310.mbox/%3CCALvhUEW8mf0URO8zPBmOzVmti%2Bjqusxa6h7KFK7KwkbNWXW7nQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com <javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > @Fabian: I couldn't exactly say. It is being a complicated month but >> > eventually, if the next week won't get complicated, it would be possible. >> > >> > @Reto: sorry, I directly commented it to Rupert via chat. I need to write >> > unit tests for STANBOL-1125. I can't remember right now but I would say I >> > already wrote an email about it. >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > El viernes, 18 de octubre de 2013, Reto Bachmann-Gmür escribió: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Having just been spending hours after merging down some cahnges to ng >> > > branch I would really advocate not adding any stuff unless urgent bug >> > > fixes. 0.12-SNAPSHOT versions have been used and thus tested for quite >> a >> > > while now. let's relase this time proven code rather than pushing in >> > > features. >> > > >> > > @Rafa: On the list I can't find the conversation betwwen you and >> Rupert. >> > > What are the issues you're working on? >> > > >> > > In general I would appreciate more discussions on the list about what's >> > > going on. I see a huge lot of commits for which I can't find any list >> > > discussion. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Reto >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Fabian Christ < >> > > christ.fab...@googlemail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > thanks for the responses. I have no problem with delaying the closing >> > > > of the release window a bit. But we have to do a cut in the next days >> > > > and proceed. >> > > > >> > > > @Rafa: Do you have a date in mind when you will have finished your >> > tasks? >> > > > >> > > > For the integration-tests issue, would be really great to have this >> > > > solved. I am currently in the process of doing a clean build an a new >> > > > machine. >> > > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > - Fabian >> > > > >> > > > 2013/10/18 Rafa Haro <rh...@zaizi.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>>: >> > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > >> > > > > As I told Rupert yesterday, I have also a couple of issues almost >> > > > finished, >> > > > > but unfortunately I'm not going to have time until next week to >> > > properly >> > > > > finish them, so I'm not in time for this release. >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > Rafa Haro >> > > > > >> > > > > El 18/10/13 12:03, Enrico Daga escribió: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Andreas, >> > > > >> I have removed all stanbol artifacts from my local repo, then run >> > mvn >> > > > >> clean >> > > > >> install (on stanbol/trunk) >> > > > >> Everything went smoothly. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> I have: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> java version "1.6.0_51" >> > > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_51-b11-456-11M4508) >> > > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.51-b01-456, mixed >> mode) >> > > > >> >> > > > >> (maybe problems are with Java 7) >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Anyway, I think if there is an unclosed problem with that and >> > Andreas >> > > > >> proposes to wait until it is fixed, we may also decide to move the >> > > > >> development to the branch (much important thing IMHO), keep trunk >> as >> > > it >> > > > is >> > > > >> (freezed) but still waiting for the problem to be solved before >> the >> > > next >> > > > >> release. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> WDYT? >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Cheers, >> > > > >> Enrico >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On 18 October 2013 10:03, Andreas Kuckartz >> > > > >> <a.kucka...@ping.de<javascript:;> >> > <javascript:;>> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> Rupert Westenthaler: >> > > > >>>> >> > > > >>>> * Further looking into the build issues of Andreas: The Security >> > > > >>>> Exceptions of the FST linking engine are already solved. But the >> > > > >>>> Entityhub tests are still failing for some reason I do not >> > > understand >> > > > >>>> yet. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> I would like to know how representative my experience is >> regarding >> > > > those >> > > > >>> build/integration test errors. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Question to all (with the exception of Rupert): >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Are you able to run "mvn clean install" without seeing a build >> > error? >> > > > >>> (And which environment are you using?) >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Cheers, >> > > > >>> Andreas >> > > > >>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have >> received >> > > > this >> > > > > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >> > > > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in >> hard >> > > > copy >> > > > > by an authorised signatory. >> > > > > >> > > > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration >> > > number >> > > > > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush >> > Road, >> > > > > London W6 7AN. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Fabian >> > > > http://twitter.com/fctwitt >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > ------------------------------ >> > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received >> this >> > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. >> > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard >> copy >> > by an authorised signatory. >> > >> > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number >> > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, >> > London W6 7AN. >> > >> > > -- > > ------------------------------ > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately. > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy > by an authorised signatory. > > Zaizi Ltd is registered in England and Wales with the registration number > 6440931. The Registered Office is Brook House, 229 Shepherds Bush Road, > London W6 7AN. -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
